One more time

@JackStone73 said in #1:
> Why do i talk about respect in my posts?
> Simple, I give an example.
>
> One of these days, I was playing against a player, ...good, good player, ...much stronger than me, ...he was winning,
>
> I made two bad moves and his game took advantage.
>
> Time was running out, he made a move,
>
> I couldn't do anything, ... with one move he won, .... instead, he gave me 5 minutes of time more, ... but I couldn't do anything,. ..he was winning the game.
>
> Okay, I could also have retired, in a bullet never say never, ...but that's not the point.
>
> He deserved the win and yet he used a tool that I define stupid and disrespectful to "give me" more time, ... time that would be useless, because with one move (and he knew it) he would have won (rightly).
>
> I tried to offer him a rematch with 5 minutes of free time to return the "favor" but he chose not to play.
>
> This is not fairplay (not the rematch thing, of course)
> And Lichess shouldn't allow players that kind of "freedom".
>
> What do you think?
Stop drama.

@JackStone73 said in #1:
> Why do i talk about respect in my posts?
> Simple, I give an example.
>
> One of these days, I was playing against a player, ...good, good player, ...much stronger than me, ...he was winning,
>
> I made two bad moves and his game took advantage.
>
> Time was running out, he made a move,
>
> I couldn't do anything, ... with one move he won, .... instead, he gave me 5 minutes of time more, ... but I couldn't do anything,. ..he was winning the game.
>
> Okay, I could also have retired, in a bullet never say never, ...but that's not the point.
>
> He deserved the win and yet he used a tool that I define stupid and disrespectful to "give me" more time, ... time that would be useless, because with one move (and he knew it) he would have won (rightly).
>
> I tried to offer him a rematch with 5 minutes of free time to return the "favor" but he chose not to play.
>
> This is not fairplay (not the rematch thing, of course)
> And Lichess shouldn't allow players that kind of "freedom".
>
> What do you think?
Yes this has happened with me once I was gonna be mated in one move and my opponent spammed my clock until I had 5 hours before checkmating me. These guys have no respect lol and it's weird and awkward when this happens. Just ignore these guys.
Edit: I don't mean the whole community I mean the people who give time with mate in 1.

"Respect for this constant whinging and wailing? Certainly not"

One day,...

...one day you will learn to interact and be a valuable member of the community.

That day you will become a champion.

The real champions, so far, are those who respect people, ...respecting the game and respecting the opponents.
It doesn't matter to have a good ranking, ... the day you figure it out, ...blow a whistle.

@pointlesswindows said in #19:
> So why do you talk about respect in your posts??

why do you ask? can't I talk about respect for opponents for some reason? Please explain to me

@Lifsitch said in #18:
> I didn't insinuate u were lyin'. "not gonna lie" means "I'm not gonna lie" which means "honestly".

if I was wrong I apologize, I was misled by the lack of the express subject

@JackStone73 said in #23:
> The real champions, so far, are those who respect people, ...respecting the game and respecting the opponents.

So you are talking of respect for other people. Yet you want to commit them and their time not only for the one game of chess that they selected to play, no, they should commit for TWO games with you. Otherwise you say they don't meet standards of fairplay, standards that YOU arrogate to set for them. Where is the respect in that?

> ...one day you will learn to interact and be a valuable member of the community.

You talking of others learning to interact is pretty rich, considering you demand that other people sacrifice their own wishes and their time to you. Do you really think you are setting the standards here and your golden behind is what the world has to revolve around? You are wrong, boy.

> That day you will become a champion.

Your slimy and patronizing attitude doesn't impress me one bit.

One more time:

Rematchosis, final stadium

lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rematch-7?page=1

"So you are talking of respect for other people. Yet you want to commit them and their time not only for the one game of chess that they selected to play, no, they should commit for TWO games with you. Otherwise you say they don't meet standards of fairplay, standards that YOU arrogate to set for them. Where is the respect in that?"

Well, This is my point of view. And respecting the people MEANS respecting the different. Personally, i like to offer a rematch when i won a game, ...in my country, giving a "rivincita" is a symbol of fairplay. That's all. Maybe because i'm Italian, i don't know, ...maybe it's about our culture, i don't know. Deal with it.

"You talking of others learning to interact is pretty rich, considering you demand that other people sacrifice their own wishes and their time to you. Do you really think you are setting the standards here and your golden behind is what the world has to revolve around? You are wrong, boy"

Please, call me sir. I'm not agree, time is precious and if you don't want to interact with me or other people here, ...please switch off, and live your life. It's so beautiful outside. Maybe you can learn a lot.

"Your slimy and patronizing attitude doesn't impress me one bit."

I'm not slimy, i'm assertive. I don't want to impress anyone, just give a different point of view, and express my personal opinion.

Take care

@Sarg0n said in #26:
> One more time:
>
> Rematchosis, final stadium
>
> lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rematch-7?page=1

Dear Sargon,

here i was talking about respecting the opponents, ....the rematchosis thing (as you said, ...i don't think it's a word, anyway) was marginal, but I had already explained my point of view.

@JackStone73 said in #28:
> Dear Sargon,
>
> here i was talking about respecting the opponents, ....the rematchosis thing (as you said, ...i don't think it's a word, anyway) was marginal, but I had already explained my point of view.
I disagree with you about the rematch issue but you are correct that people who add more time before checkmating are creepy.