привет
@jo_thedragonmaster said in #10:
> are you dumb @Buttercup22 you are violated the Lichess Terms of Service
I literally just addressed this in the post above . Since one inch is too much work for you to move your eyeballs I will restate my response to this query
>Your statement makes several wild assumptions. First why do you assume that I claim to be smart?
Secondly, and this is the one that really pisses me off, you assume that because I have a TOS mark that means Lichess thought I cheated. It doesn't. Quite astonishingly they award this little badge for something as benign as trying to see how low of a rating you can achieve. I can tell you because I paid the price it's 600. Well at least my sacrifice allowed others to know this for sure without them having to get the badge too. You're welcome.
And be warned taking jabs at someone over cheating, alleged or otherwise, will get you a communication ban.
> are you dumb @Buttercup22 you are violated the Lichess Terms of Service
I literally just addressed this in the post above . Since one inch is too much work for you to move your eyeballs I will restate my response to this query
>Your statement makes several wild assumptions. First why do you assume that I claim to be smart?
Secondly, and this is the one that really pisses me off, you assume that because I have a TOS mark that means Lichess thought I cheated. It doesn't. Quite astonishingly they award this little badge for something as benign as trying to see how low of a rating you can achieve. I can tell you because I paid the price it's 600. Well at least my sacrifice allowed others to know this for sure without them having to get the badge too. You're welcome.
And be warned taking jabs at someone over cheating, alleged or otherwise, will get you a communication ban.
@Buttercup22 said in #13:
> I literally just addressed this in the post above . Since one inch is too much work for you to move your eyeballs I will restate my response to this query
>
>
> Secondly, and this is the one that really pisses me off, you assume that because I have a TOS mark that means Lichess thought I cheated. It doesn't. Quite astonishingly they award this little badge for something as benign as trying to see how low of a rating you can achieve. I can tell you because I paid the price it's 600. Well at least my sacrifice allowed others to know this for sure without them having to get the badge too. You're welcome.
> And be warned taking jabs at someone over cheating, alleged or otherwise, will get you a communication ban. sorry
Buttercup22
> I literally just addressed this in the post above . Since one inch is too much work for you to move your eyeballs I will restate my response to this query
>
>
> Secondly, and this is the one that really pisses me off, you assume that because I have a TOS mark that means Lichess thought I cheated. It doesn't. Quite astonishingly they award this little badge for something as benign as trying to see how low of a rating you can achieve. I can tell you because I paid the price it's 600. Well at least my sacrifice allowed others to know this for sure without them having to get the badge too. You're welcome.
> And be warned taking jabs at someone over cheating, alleged or otherwise, will get you a communication ban. sorry
Buttercup22
@Buttercup22 The chess community applauds you for your sacrifice. You should change your name to ‘BurningMartyr’.
@BorisOspasky said in #15:
> @Buttercup22 The chess community applauds you for your sacrifice. You should change your name to ‘BurningMartyr’.
Finally at last someone who appreciates me, although with heavy sarcasm. Pinch me I must be dreaming.
> @Buttercup22 The chess community applauds you for your sacrifice. You should change your name to ‘BurningMartyr’.
Finally at last someone who appreciates me, although with heavy sarcasm. Pinch me I must be dreaming.
@Buttercup22 I'm not starting another argument with you, I swear, but I have to ask you why didn't you just google "lichess lowest rating" or something like that if that was your reason for sandbagging. It's not like the 600 rating floor is a secret.
@jeffsonadam said in #18:
> @Buttercup22 I'm not starting another argument with you, I swear, but I have to ask you why didn't you just google "lichess lowest rating" or something like that if that was your reason for sandbagging. It's not like the 600 rating floor is a secret.
Ok, since you're not trying to start another argument with me I will give you a straightforward answer. I think it's good to have a healthy skepticism in general and especially about things you hear on the internet and want to see proof for yourself.
> @Buttercup22 I'm not starting another argument with you, I swear, but I have to ask you why didn't you just google "lichess lowest rating" or something like that if that was your reason for sandbagging. It's not like the 600 rating floor is a secret.
Ok, since you're not trying to start another argument with me I will give you a straightforward answer. I think it's good to have a healthy skepticism in general and especially about things you hear on the internet and want to see proof for yourself.
If you cheat in Lichess, your cheat has a 98% chance of getting detected the first time.
(Sometimes it doesnt)
(Sometimes it doesnt)
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.