@Brian-E said in #2:
> It's a broad term, certainly with more than one dimension. But here are several important questions to ask yourself in order to identify what makes up your style.
>
> - Are you a "positional player" or a "tactical player"? Very roughly, positional players are at their strongest if the game involves planning, strategic manoeuvring, identifying creating and exploiting weak pawns and weak squares, etc. Tactical players are better if there are lots of combinations involved, direct attacks on the king, etc.
>
> - Are you a strong endgame player, or do you play best in the middlegame?
>
> - Are you happiest if you're attacking, even if it involves sacrificing material, or are you a strong defender who is happy to weather the storm and win later with the weaknesses your opponent has created or the material they have sacrificed?
>
> Answering those questions about yourself will help you decide which openings are best for you and how to try to steer the course of your games.
Thanks for your answer, it clears my doubts.
I think nowadays i am more into positional player rather than tactical.